The Investings Insider – Investing and Stock News
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Why Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Economy

Schumer forces name change for ‘big, beautiful bill’ moments before it passes

by July 1, 2025
by July 1, 2025 0 comment

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., forced a name change for President Donald Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ moments before the legislative package passed the upper chamber of Congress.

While Sen. Pete Ricketts, R-Neb., was chairing the Senate, Schumer raised a point of order against lines three to five on the first page of the legislative proposal that said, ‘SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ‘’One Big Beautiful Bill Act.”

Schumer argued the title of the bill violated Section 313 B1A of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, or what’s commonly referred to as the ‘Byrd Rule.’

Ricketts said the point of order was sustained, meaning that text will be stricken from the bill.

‘This is not a ‘big, beautiful bill’ at all. That’s why I moved down the floor to strike the title. It is now called ‘the act.’ That’s what it’s called. But it is really the ‘big ugly betrayal,’ and the American people know it,’ Schumer told reporters. ‘This vote will haunt our Republican colleagues for years to come. Because of this bill, tens of millions will lose health insurance. Millions of jobs will disappear. People will get sick and die, kids will go hungry and the debt will explode to levels we have never seen.

‘This bill is so irredeemable that one Republican literally chose to retire rather than vote yes and decimate his own state,’ Schumer added, referring to Sen. Thom Tills, R-N.C.

Asked whether he hoped to irritate Trump by changing the name of the bill, Schumer responded, ‘I didn’t even think of President Trump. I thought of the truth. This is not a beautiful bill. Anyone who loses their health insurance doesn’t think it’s beautiful. Any worker in the clean energy industry who loses their job does not think it’s beautiful. Any mom who can’t feed her kid on $5 a day doesn’t think it’s beautiful. We wanted the American people to know the truth.’

The Senate narrowly passed Trump’s $3.3 trillion spending package by a 51-50 vote on Tuesday after an all-night voting session.

Vice President JD Vance was the tiebreaking vote. No Senate Democrats crossed the aisle to support the legislation. Tillis and Republican senators Rand Paul of Kentucky and Susan Collins of Maine opposed the megabill.

Democrats condemned the bill’s passage, including Schumer’s fellow New Yorker, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. She has not confirmed a primary run.

‘JD Vance was the deciding vote to cut Medicaid across the country,’ the progressive ‘Squad’ member wrote on X. ‘An absolute and utter betrayal of working families.’

Vance championed the bill as securing ‘massive tax cuts, especially no tax on tips and overtime. And most importantly, big money for border security.’

‘This is a big win for the American people,’ the vice president wrote.

He also approved an assessment by longtime GOP operative Roger Stone.

‘The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projects Trump’s reconciliation bill would add $3.3 trillion to the national debt over the next decade by extending the president’s tax cuts that he first implemented in 2017. In fact, federal revenues spiked after the 2017 Trump tax cuts just like they did after Reagan and JFK implemented across-the-board tax cuts,’ Stone wrote.

‘The deficit is caused by excess spending which the administration is addressing in a series of recision bills. PS the CBO is always wrong.’

Despite initial reservations, Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, voted in favor of the legislation after Republicans added Alaska-specific provisions to curry her favor.

The bill now heads back to the House for final approval. Congress must reconcile differences between the Senate and House versions of the bill, namely on Medicaid. Republican leaders are aiming to get it to the president’s desk by Friday, July 4.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Why Justice Jackson is a fish out of water on the Supreme Court
next post
Trump reiterates July 4th megabill deadline

You may also like

Trump turns to Supreme Court in fight to oust Biden-era consumer safety officials

July 3, 2025

Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ stalls in House amid conservative mutiny threats

July 2, 2025

Bush teams up with notorious Trump foes to trash ‘colossal mistake’ shuttering USAID

July 2, 2025

Democratic doctors’ protest against Trump’s ‘beautiful bill’ derailed by flood of US Capitol tourists

July 2, 2025

Wisconsin Supreme Court decides abortion case that prompted most expensive judicial election in US...

July 2, 2025

Iran to suspend work with UN nuclear watchdog, president says

July 2, 2025

Hamas ‘serious’ about reaching ceasefire agreement but insists on long-standing demands

July 2, 2025

State Department unveils patriotic ‘America First’ rebrand as part of sweeping makeover

July 2, 2025

What’s next for Iran’s terror army, the IRGC, after devastating military setbacks?

July 2, 2025

Federal climate website goes dark as Trump administration promises policy reset

July 2, 2025

    The Investings Insider

    Address:

    12828 Willow Centre Dr Ste D #
    Houston, TX 77066

    Phone: 917-444-3121

    Sarah Carter

    Email Marketing Manager

    sarah@theinvestingsinsider.com

    Mathias Swift

    Email Marketing Manager

    michael@theinvestingsinsider.com

    Emily Adams

    Billing Contact Details

    david@theinvestingsinsider.com

    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Email Whitelisting

    Copyright © 2025 theinvestingsinsider.com All Rights Reserved.

    The Investings Insider – Investing and Stock News
    • About Us
    • Our Team
    • Why Us
    • Blog
    • Contact Us